User:CharlineWills00

file down site
When compared to following clouds, media playback in mobile environments is advantageous. Especially regarding videos, the next cloud needs to be downloaded as a whole, while streaming. Just to stream! I have to install another app again. Cloud alone is not enough to stream.

Faster than the next cloud. About 20%.

When you open a document with a cloud viewer, it breaks significantly less than another cloud (but breaking itself has already been a problem).

Web app is supported. It's rudimentary, but it is possible to write. However, the thing is that the document format is a bizarre format, such as .ndoc, which makes it extremely incompatible.

File sharing through the URL (but this is as far as another cloud is concerned).

Webhard

It includes a smaller capacity when compared to next cloud.

Compared to foreign cloud services, it boasts poor service quality.

When compared to next cloud, it is extremely disadvantageous for music playback. Continuous streaming is possible only for several selected sound sources. The next cloud only needs to be in a folder.

You need to share a URL and that means you can't share music files or videos.

According to the report, there exists a saying that N drive appears like a local drive when installed, but only it comes out like a local drive, that is no not the same as the folder synchronization setting. It's a whole lot worse for computers in the first place when external programs play tricks on them. It's much better to just clean up the synchronization folder.***

It is very specialized in playing music. In particular, it's the only cloud that may play sound sources in an environment much like MP3 players we are acquainted with. Although each song has some buffering, it seems to play around 192kpbs continuously, let's assume that communication is in good shape in a 3G environment. Needless to say, in reality, it's often take off at that point)

It includes a large capacity. This is a significant advantage when considering domestic cloud services all together, which have poor quality of media access in cloud services.

You can substitute the end drive above. In particular, in case a picture is within a document, it is rarely opened properly.

Streaming songs often cuts off (but not often) due to communication issues with the cloud, not Internet speed problems. Personally i think like it's about once every two hours. And if you pay attention to high-quality sound sources, it gets buffered often, or if you are in a place where in fact the 3G environment isn't smooth, it gets cut off more often. And when it's in that state, you need to find the path of the folder where the song was playing and play it again.

The only way to share is folder sharing. Only some documents or presentation files are available for file viewing. Except for those points, there is nothing to say even if it is almost a webhard level.

Foreign Cloud Comparison (Google Drive, Dropbox, Box, Skydrive)

Google Drive

It exerts tremendous power on paper documents. In particular, even without an office program, Google Drive can cover it to some extent. Not fancy ppts or fancy excels, almost any simple document is OK.

It is advantageous to reflect the progress of work in the mobile environment. By establishing only offline views, the files you focus on can continue being reflected in the cloud in real time. It is just a very convenient feature for sharing files with other users.

It is easy to connect to other Google services such as for example Gmail.

Unless you upload documents right to the Google drive but write them on the Google drive web app, the capacity of the file will not take into account cloud storage (what can you mean, if you just utilize the web app, the capacity of the Google drive is infinite).

Now, photo media access is strong at the dropbox level. You can flip through photos and videos could be played immediately. However, the loading time seems to take a little longer than the dropbox. I feel it), but it doesn't bother me.

There are the most apps that could be connected. In a desktop environment. Various connection apps allow various operations in the web environment without installing programs using the pc. It's a bit of a problem that the app doesn't connect at all on mobile, but it is the best in the desktop environment.

Upload a small pdf file and change it out to Google Docs format. It could then be stored again in MS Word format or something. However, it is only possible with pdf files of 2MB or less.

There is no bandwidth restriction in name. There's a testimony that it's a block after a large amount of writing, but it isn't stipulated by company policy.

If you use Google Docs web app, you can save documents indefinitely, but if you save them indefinitely, it's the same as once you lose your Internet connection, you're going to sink and use MS word, right?)

Google Docs web app, cloud-connected web app, support for editing files using a variety of programs, nonetheless it is still crude compared to office programs used on computers.Could it be obvious?)


Dropbox

It exerts its strongest power in media viewing. Photo folders? Could be flipped smoothly (Domestic cloud services require a specific amount of buffering time for every photo). However, if you wait a little bit for the dropbox, the photos in a single folder are loaded entirely. While considering Photo A, Photo B is loaded and scrolling can be done without any blockage. Video? Beyond streaming, you can freely specify before start of playback. It is the best in the world when it comes to media reading.

There are various means of increasing capacity. Camera upload settings, invitation of friends, events at the company level, etc.



The speed is relatively good. It is a lot faster than the Box and doesn't work with Google Drive.

The file capacity limit that may be uploaded from a free account may be the largest. 300MB.

The bandwidth of the free account is bigger than that of the Box. It really is updated by 20GB each day. It's practically infinite unless you're going to share large files.

The starting capacity may be the smallest. Two gigabytes of dirt.

Price compared to capacity is the most expensive cloud service. Dirty bastards...

There is a saying that changes in documents can't be reflected in real time when working on documents.

Word documents shouldn't flip different files like picture documents.

The dropbox itself cannot be documented.

There are the most compatible apps in the mobile environment. In order to work on a document, you can choose the interface you want through the app drive and focus on it leisurely.

In the case of document files, simple document inquiry is a convenient axis because previews are given. Unlike additional.dropboxes, if you can find multiple Word documents in a folder, Word documents can also be flipped over the file or file, as can be seen in the photo file.

File sharing support is quite good. This box allows anyone who manages or creates a web page to talk about data conveniently with little use of the net page's resources. However, the bandwidth of the free account is 10GB per month, which is quite small.

Slow. Not paid people.

Media access is quite disadvantageous. It's a whole lot worse than Google Drive, which says it's disadvantageous above. It's easier to just do it on some type of computer than listen to it for a test.

The uploadable file capacity limit is the smallest. 100MB. Free account only.

In a mobile environment, real-time documentation is rarely supported.

If you don't install Boxeditor, the documentation will be written with an extension that may only be written on Box (it works, so it is better than Dropbox, but it's significantly less than Google Drive).

It had been recently updated (on 22 February?). Media access is currently quite convenient. Especially photo files. However the pace is still a bit slow.***

Skydrive

The writing function is quite powerful. Many cloud services offer Web apps. But Skydrive's is the most similar to the MS office documenting environment we've often used. And there's also the most supported handwriting, though it is four-legged.

The basic capacity is quite good. 7GB. Well, it isn't that strong a difference.

It is no exaggeration to state that the interface of mobile apps may be the most backward cloud service ever.

Feel free to visit my web blog ... p2p 사이트